EXHIBIT SELECTION & SOURCE LIMITS
The fourteen exhibit images are selected excerpts. Individually reviewed source files are also available in the public evidence index; other complete originals remain private.
For a continuous reading experience, use the selected evidence book: 18 images, 22 pages (PDF). This is not the unredacted 301-page source archive.
These images are derivative excerpts. They cannot by themselves prove that every original electronic message was sent by the displayed speaker, or that no additional context exists. The complete source records are preserved privately. Provenance and privacy decisions for the selected images are recorded in the private source ledger.
Source: U9 E2: January2021-part1; family-message derivative
Excerpt treatment: First excerpt from a captured pre-closing thread; ends within Aileen’s reply. Does not establish completeness of surrounding messages.
Limit: Cebuano mixed source; translated by party.
Source: U9 E2: January2021-part2; family-message derivative
Excerpt treatment: Second excerpt from the captured pre-closing thread; starts within Aileen’s reply. The two screenshots are not a native full-thread export.
Limit: Source-language quote; user attestation, non-independent.
Source: U9 E2: RR23, physical page 2 (2021 transaction-row excerpt)
Excerpt treatment: Crop 1190x445 from top-left.
Limit: Financial identifier masking retained.
Source: U9 E2: RR23, physical page 3 (borrower-side estimated statement)
Excerpt treatment: Privacy-minimized crop of the 2021 estimated borrower statement. Escrow officer identity and incidental nonparty business contacts have been permanently replaced by image pixels; dates, borrower names, funding figures and estimated status remain visible.
Limit: Estimated statement, not a final settlement disclosure or proof of an exclusive ownership interest.
Source: U9 E2: Visual I7 VS09-01
Excerpt treatment: TRUNCATED MESSAGE EXCERPT. The selected screenshot stops in the middle of Aileen's financing-risk explanation. The end of that message and the wider thread are not shown; no conclusion here relies on the omitted words.
Limit: Negotiation language, not an ownership conveyance. Cropped screenshot is not a complete conversation.
Source: U9 E2: Visual I7 VS12-01
Excerpt treatment: Entire selected derivative image; this does not represent the entire original conversation or document.
Limit: The Cebuano “inyuha diay ang Silver Creek? delusional” challenges the claimed ownership, and the text urges purchase-loan approval. This is one selected screenshot, not the complete conversation.
Source: U9 E2: quoted-email excerpt in Romeo outer reply
Excerpt treatment: Text reconstructed from an earlier email quoted in Romeo's reply; the original Aileen-sent email was not independently obtained. Do not present this rendering as a verified screenshot of her outgoing email.
Limit: ATTRIBUTED TO AILEEN IN A QUOTATION INSIDE ROMEO'S REPLY - SENDER-ORIGINAL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED. The same quoted reply mentions “ANOTHER business loan” and consequences for the AFH, important to understanding “OUR house, Silver Creek” in context.
Source: U9 E2: RR31 lease amendment, cropped recital
Excerpt treatment: Entire selected derivative image; this does not represent the entire original conversation or document.
Limit: Clause does not waive future payments.
Source: U9 E2: RR01 complaint, excerpt from filed allegation
Excerpt treatment: Entire selected derivative image; this does not represent the entire original conversation or document.
Limit: Plaintiffs' allegation, not judicial finding.
Source: U9 E2: Visual I7 VS03-01
Excerpt treatment: Entire selected derivative image; this does not represent the entire original conversation or document.
Limit: Other party explained renovations were not compelled.
Source: U9 E2: Visual I7 VS04-02
Excerpt treatment: Entire selected derivative image; this does not represent the entire original conversation or document.
Limit: Value statement not a promise of reimbursement.
Source: U9 E2: judicial addendum image, same Court outcome
Excerpt treatment: Entire selected derivative image; this does not represent the entire original conversation or document.
Limit: The written addendum excerpt states no basis for an order under RCW 7.105, no active threat of violence and insufficient proof of a harassment pattern, while also warning against unwanted contact. The printed heading repeats one cause number, so this single image does not independently authenticate two identical court findings. The denial did not find that petitioners knowingly lied.
Source: Native Pierce County Superior Court complaint, physical page 5
Excerpt treatment: Cropped PDF render x=50..570, y=74..285, 2.15x.
Limit: Requested remedy, not a granted writ.
Source: U9 E2: RR24, physical page 2, recorded deed page 1
Excerpt treatment: Crop 1224x1090 from top-left.
Limit: Recording source, transfer is not finding of wrongdoing.
RESTRICTED EVIDENCE / JUNE 2026
ABC Elder Care’s business account records a $3,798.68 payment to Jun on June 9, 2026. Freedom Mortgage separately records a matching installment on June 12. These records corroborate continued payments while title remained in Jun and Aileen’s names. The original bank statement remains private. See the dated payment sequence.
Read the paired pre-closing messages: Open paired January exchange. Read Romeo’s preceding message, repayment language and original Cebuano together; this is a selected exchange with party translation.